Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
P
pico-sdk
Manage
Activity
Members
Code
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
GitLab community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Microcontroller
pico-sdk
Commits
81982f07
Commit
81982f07
authored
3 years ago
by
graham sanderson
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Missed doc change in #850
parent
ef47dfee
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
src/rp2_common/hardware_gpio/include/hardware/gpio.h
+2
-0
2 additions, 0 deletions
src/rp2_common/hardware_gpio/include/hardware/gpio.h
with
2 additions
and
0 deletions
src/rp2_common/hardware_gpio/include/hardware/gpio.h
+
2
−
0
View file @
81982f07
...
@@ -615,6 +615,8 @@ static inline void gpio_add_raw_irq_handler(uint gpio, irq_handler_t handler) {
...
@@ -615,6 +615,8 @@ static inline void gpio_add_raw_irq_handler(uint gpio, irq_handler_t handler) {
*
*
* This method removes such a callback, and enables the "default" callback for the specified GPIOs.
* This method removes such a callback, and enables the "default" callback for the specified GPIOs.
*
*
* \note You should always use the same gpio_mask as you used when you added the raw IRQ handler.
*
* @param gpio_mask a bit mask of the GPIO numbers that will now be passed to the default callback for this core
* @param gpio_mask a bit mask of the GPIO numbers that will now be passed to the default callback for this core
* @param handler the handler to remove from the list of GPIO IRQ handlers for this core
* @param handler the handler to remove from the list of GPIO IRQ handlers for this core
*/
*/
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment